首页Home / 案例Cases
CASE FILES

案例经验(脱敏处理)Case Files (Sanitized)

佑信为多家国内外知名企业、律师事务所提供合规调查服务,我们同时对所有客户的业务承诺保密。在征得相关客户同意后,将其中几件经过脱敏处理的典型案例分享。

We serve leading corporations and law firms under strict confidentiality. With client consent, we share a small number of sanitized, representative cases below.

案例一Case 01

高管利益冲突核查

Executive Conflict-of-Interest Review

高管职务侵占Executive Misconduct
目标客户背景Client background

国内某中型金融公司,员工数百人,多家大中型银行的合作伙伴。

A mid-sized domestic financial firm with hundreds of employees, partnered with several major banks.

案件背景Situation

客户发现高端客户在即将成交阶段大量流失,但跟进过程却毫无差错,损失极大。

The client saw high-value customers disappear right before deals closed, despite a flawless follow-up process — with significant losses.

调查成果Findings

公司内部某高管通过相关亲属开设竞争公司,将公司客户引流至自己公司,极大影响公司利益。

An internal executive had set up a competing firm through relatives, quietly diverting clients — materially harming the company.

成果应用Outcome

我们向客户提供书面、录音等证据,为公司管理人员决策提供依据,避免和挽回损失。

We supplied documentary and audio evidence to support management's decision-making, helping avoid and recover losses.

案例二Case 02

交易对手关联关系核查

Counterparty Relationship Verification

不正当竞争Unfair Competition
目标客户背景Client background

国内某互联网公司,员工数千人,行业内前三。

A domestic internet company with thousands of employees, ranked top-3 in its industry.

案件背景Situation

客户与某第三方公司签署知识产权转让合同,支付完定金后对方却突然反悔,称合同无效,但客户已投入大量资金,损失不可估量。

After paying a deposit under an IP transfer agreement, the counterparty suddenly claimed the contract was invalid — with the client already having committed substantial funds.

调查成果Findings

第三方公司实际控制人与客户最大的竞争对手为兄弟关系,客户在交易前未做详细的背景调查,以致踏入竞争对手设置的陷阱。

The counterparty's real controller turned out to be the sibling of the client's top competitor — a trap that a prior background check would have revealed.

成果应用Outcome

我们为其搜集相关证据,帮助客户赢得诉讼。

We gathered supporting evidence that helped the client win the resulting litigation.

案例三Case 03

债务人资产状况核查

Debtor Asset Verification

财产追踪Asset Tracing
目标客户背景Client background

某国外制造商,产品在国内市场占有一定地位。

An overseas manufacturer with an established position in the Chinese market.

案件背景Situation

客户的国内某代理商拖欠货款数千万元,诉讼时发现该代理商实际控制人名下无任何财产。

A domestic distributor defaulted on tens of millions in payments; litigation revealed the controller held no assets in their own name.

调查成果Findings

拖欠货款是该代理商早有预谋的行为,其实际控制人通过离婚、破产等方式将财产转移至其妻子、儿女名下,但实际间接操控2家企业与1家酒店。

The default was premeditated — the controller had transferred assets to a spouse and children via divorce and bankruptcy filings, while still indirectly controlling two companies and a hotel.

成果应用Outcome

我们获取了企业员工证实其实际控制人的录音材料,并获取其签署的酒店地址租赁材料,为客户进行执行提供了帮助。

We obtained staff testimony confirming the real controller, plus signed lease documents for the hotel property — supporting the client's enforcement action.

出于保密原则,更多脱敏案例仅在初步沟通之后分享。For confidentiality, additional sanitized cases are shared only after an initial conversation. 联系我们Contact Us